The non-Proliferation Diplomacy of the the Non-Nuclear -Weapon States.

The Non-Proliferation Diplomacy of the Non-Nuclear-Weapon States: Understanding International Responses to Iran's Nuclear Defiance



This paper explores the responses of the non-nuclear-weapon states (NNWS) to Iran’s violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), focusing on the stance adopted by members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) in the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). In February 2006, key NAM members voted to refer Iran to the UN Security Council in a move that stunned Iranian diplomats, and seemed to signal a collapse in NAM solidarity on fundamental non-proliferation issues.
But the issue is, does Iran violate the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty?
Iran said that it has the Atomic Energy with good intensions; in the other hand testing a long range missile with is capable to reach Israel and other countries it shared border with.
I taught it was necessary for Iran to se a diplomatic solutions for this problem, because if the United Nations give Iran sanctions it will affect the poor masses in Iran including the opposition that are not in support of this current government regime.
To avoid war on Iran, should Iran comply with the United Nations or not?
If Iran did not comply, the action plan for Nuclear disarmament and Non-Proliferation will take place, and that will be United Nations sanction against Iran or Military actions against Iran.
But are the United Nations going to disarm India, Pakistan, and Israel for keeping there Nuclear arms because its shared border with Iran, if not Iran will be considering these three countries as a big treat to its country.
How did this Nuclear got in to there hands, who sold it to them, are the going to refund there money to them? How much does it cost to purchase them?



t