Thursday, 18 March 2010

sub: public diplomacy.

Student N0. 05050694

Student.Name:Abdi Adan 2010-03-17

Blogging: Sub: PUBLIC DIPLOMACY.



The Public Diplomacy might be explaining as the way in which States leaders

communicate with one of other at the highest levels. The public diplomacy is

clear and net. The different organisations take the lion’s share with a public

diplomacy, or multi-lateral organisation such as, NGO’S and The unites Nations,

communicate with citizens in other societies. The public diplomacy describes

mostly Sales, Films, Televisions, Music, Sports, and other/cultural activities are

seen by public diplomacy advocate to a very great extent important avenues for

otherwise of different kinds of citizens to understand each other and integral to

the international cultural understanding, which the governments are a key of

goals of modern public diplomacy strategy.


Public Diplomacy consists about the following objectives:

- New public diplomacy
- Support Foreign Policy objectives
- The communications, Traders, Negotiations.
- The National Interests of States & so, on

Public diplomacy moved to define a new direct attention of traditional diplomacy

and it has since been taken by other foreign ministers and the public relations the

making as general. When the political leaders and foreign policy experts discussed

or they understood that the public diplomacy it is neither propaganda nor public

relations, but unlike anything else, the form of diplomacy that is only in this present

time coming into current fashion. For the reason of that, a new definition would be

adopted which puts the activities of public diplomacy into the context of traditional

diplomacy, and connects between it to the larges mission of foreign policy making

and execution.


A new definition of public diplomacy.

In order to understand the evolution of this an idea, a view of the quality of being

Clear, propaganda and public relations in order “propaganda” is kind of campaign,

In definition is the systemic propagation of a doctrine or information describing

the views and interests of those focusing such a doctrine or cause. On other side,

public diplomacy is a business of inducing the public to have understanding for

and goodwill towards nation


Inclusion, both of them or these terms connection with an idea of public diplomacy,

but neither one alone satisfactorily describes it. In this point thus for consideration

of a new definition of public diplomacy, one that takes into consider the needs of the

foreign policy making apparatus in the support country. (I.e. the government

preparing in a public diplomacy campaign) with respect to direct to country. But the

other foreign diplomacies wherein the public diplomacy campaign is taking place,

while accepting the truth of the contributions of propaganda studies and public

relations to control.


Public Diplomacy: the important point planning and execution of information,

Cultural and educational programming by dictating the country to create a public

opinion environment in a country its self or countries that will enable target

country political leaders to make decisions that are supportive of commanding

country’s foreign policy objectives. Public diplomacy will sometimes assume

this objectives as, for example, an account of the facts of a situation, human rights

abuses, dictatorial practices, political and religious repression.

3 comments:

  1. Quote me if Iam wrong, there is where you said that public diplomacy is about dictatorship by the state leader.You should know that public diplomacy is about ambassadors or their representatives trying to sell their services to other nations eg tourism and can be exchange students. I do agree though at times its all about propaganda but at the same you should know that with improved technology, there are so many sources that one can access information.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Following on from Joes point, whereas Public diplomacy can sometimes be described as propaganda, dictatorship is a very strong label to give it and I think there would be few cases where you could tie dictastorship and public diplomacy together. In any case the propoganda may come from the state misleading foreign public opinion but inevitably with mass communications technology the truth would eventually come out. It is in a states best interest in the long run to promote itself honestly across cultures.

    ReplyDelete
  3. sorry if i enter your blog but in my view actions are louder than words, and i'm not talking about military actions, but about actions that enchange your reputation abroad such as Norway active involvement in aid and development. my point is that, thinking about US public diplomacy about development, it made great speeches but actually, the practice contraddicted its words. the Development Assistance Commettee, made up by the richest countries of the world, agreed that the state members would contribute to international aid with 0.7% of their GDP, however USA , as many others, does not meet the target contribuing with just 0.08% of its GDP. and if you go to my blog which in blog B, you will find a list of points that make me skeptical about US public diplomacy, which in my view is very close to propaganda.

    ReplyDelete